<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Question of the Week:  How Bad Is&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rockcritics.com/2008/01/21/question-of-the-week-how-bad-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rockcritics.com/2008/01/21/question-of-the-week-how-bad-is/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 13:00:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: keefycub</title>
		<link>http://rockcritics.com/2008/01/21/question-of-the-week-how-bad-is/#comment-2195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[keefycub]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockcritics.com/2008/01/21/question-of-the-week-how-bad-is/#comment-2195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone knows that RAWK CRITICS don&#039;t work in offices, if you can call what they do work at all.  They starve in a single room crammed to the hilt with CDs and LP&#039;s of some weird ideal of theirs without any regard whatsoever to whether a lot of people will identify with what they&#039;re listening to and attempt to outhip each other. No album is great except for the album that remains the favourite from day one. There is snobbery toward any music happening in secret (such as the current wave of uberprog happening underground right this very moment with Canterbury and Sun Ra as lift-off points, led by groups and performers such as Subvulture, Vain, Cat Army, and Psychic Domanophone) and you won&#039;t ever hear of any new bands until they&#039;ve released their fifth or sixth album if they get that far.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone knows that RAWK CRITICS don&#8217;t work in offices, if you can call what they do work at all.  They starve in a single room crammed to the hilt with CDs and LP&#8217;s of some weird ideal of theirs without any regard whatsoever to whether a lot of people will identify with what they&#8217;re listening to and attempt to outhip each other. No album is great except for the album that remains the favourite from day one. There is snobbery toward any music happening in secret (such as the current wave of uberprog happening underground right this very moment with Canterbury and Sun Ra as lift-off points, led by groups and performers such as Subvulture, Vain, Cat Army, and Psychic Domanophone) and you won&#8217;t ever hear of any new bands until they&#8217;ve released their fifth or sixth album if they get that far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

