<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Question of the Week: What bands are among the most underrated&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rockcritics.com/2009/11/01/question-of-the-week-what-bands-are-among-the-most-underrated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rockcritics.com/2009/11/01/question-of-the-week-what-bands-are-among-the-most-underrated/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 08:25:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdf</title>
		<link>http://rockcritics.com/2009/11/01/question-of-the-week-what-bands-are-among-the-most-underrated/#comment-4038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pdf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 01:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockcritics.com/?p=1425#comment-4038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a big fan of Pink&#039;s, and I agree she doesn&#039;t get the attention she deserves. But I&#039;m a little off-center even among her fan base, in that I think &quot;Try This&quot; is her best album.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a big fan of Pink&#8217;s, and I agree she doesn&#8217;t get the attention she deserves. But I&#8217;m a little off-center even among her fan base, in that I think &#8220;Try This&#8221; is her best album.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s woods</title>
		<link>http://rockcritics.com/2009/11/01/question-of-the-week-what-bands-are-among-the-most-underrated/#comment-4034</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[s woods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockcritics.com/?p=1425#comment-4034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think I agree more with your second point than your first, Steven (though Freddie Mercury? I don&#039;t hear nearly so much theatrical flair or whooping around in Pink&#039;s voice. Plant and Joplin, absolutely.). But regarding the first point, surely, the &quot;she’s hard to pigeonhole, one label does not fit all&quot; idea is precisely a reason &lt;i&gt;for&lt;/i&gt; rock critics to gravitate towards her. I actually have a theory (entirely serious, though I&#039;ve never done an actual background study to prove or disprove it) that 95% of record reviews are about that exact thing: the critic telling you how un-pigeonhole-able said artist is. It&#039;s almost like the number one fallback position for a rock critic to take (I don&#039;t let myself off the hook here; I&#039;m certain that 95% of my own record reviews are about this also). 

So I&#039;m not saying I disagree with your choice of Pink as underrated by rock critics, but I don&#039;t think her eclectic nature is the core reason.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I agree more with your second point than your first, Steven (though Freddie Mercury? I don&#8217;t hear nearly so much theatrical flair or whooping around in Pink&#8217;s voice. Plant and Joplin, absolutely.). But regarding the first point, surely, the &#8220;she’s hard to pigeonhole, one label does not fit all&#8221; idea is precisely a reason <i>for</i> rock critics to gravitate towards her. I actually have a theory (entirely serious, though I&#8217;ve never done an actual background study to prove or disprove it) that 95% of record reviews are about that exact thing: the critic telling you how un-pigeonhole-able said artist is. It&#8217;s almost like the number one fallback position for a rock critic to take (I don&#8217;t let myself off the hook here; I&#8217;m certain that 95% of my own record reviews are about this also). </p>
<p>So I&#8217;m not saying I disagree with your choice of Pink as underrated by rock critics, but I don&#8217;t think her eclectic nature is the core reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://rockcritics.com/2009/11/01/question-of-the-week-what-bands-are-among-the-most-underrated/#comment-4031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockcritics.com/?p=1425#comment-4031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pink.

OK, I wasn&#039;t the first one to say it ... James Montgomery at MTV.com had a piece, &quot;Pink: The World&#039;s Most Underrated Superstar.&quot; (http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1623246/20091006/story.jhtml) Oxymoron, I know ... how can a superstar be underrated? But this is rockcritics.com, and while Pink doesn&#039;t get dissed by critics, I think she often gets ignored (she&#039;s currently ranked the 1377th-best artist on the Acclaimed.music compilation of critics). Main reasons I think she&#039;s underrated: 1) she&#039;s hard to pigeonhole, one label does not fit all ... on her current tour, besides her own songs, she covers AC/DC, Led Zeppelin, Queen, and Gnarls Barkley. 2) To the extent people do label her, she&#039;s tossed into the &quot;teen pop star who grew up&quot; pile. So she&#039;s compared to Xtina and Britney and Justin (aka the 3 Mouseketeers), but not to Robert Plant or Freddie Mercury or Janis Joplin (she comes off well in the latter comparisons, but no one bothers, because she&#039;s not taken seriously enough). 3) She has never made a 100% great album.

The best one is Missundaztood, but it got the most critical attention, so it&#039;s not really her most underrated album. I&#039;ll go with the most recent, Funhouse.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pink.</p>
<p>OK, I wasn&#8217;t the first one to say it &#8230; James Montgomery at MTV.com had a piece, &#8220;Pink: The World&#8217;s Most Underrated Superstar.&#8221; (<a href="http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1623246/20091006/story.jhtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1623246/20091006/story.jhtml</a>) Oxymoron, I know &#8230; how can a superstar be underrated? But this is rockcritics.com, and while Pink doesn&#8217;t get dissed by critics, I think she often gets ignored (she&#8217;s currently ranked the 1377th-best artist on the Acclaimed.music compilation of critics). Main reasons I think she&#8217;s underrated: 1) she&#8217;s hard to pigeonhole, one label does not fit all &#8230; on her current tour, besides her own songs, she covers AC/DC, Led Zeppelin, Queen, and Gnarls Barkley. 2) To the extent people do label her, she&#8217;s tossed into the &#8220;teen pop star who grew up&#8221; pile. So she&#8217;s compared to Xtina and Britney and Justin (aka the 3 Mouseketeers), but not to Robert Plant or Freddie Mercury or Janis Joplin (she comes off well in the latter comparisons, but no one bothers, because she&#8217;s not taken seriously enough). 3) She has never made a 100% great album.</p>
<p>The best one is Missundaztood, but it got the most critical attention, so it&#8217;s not really her most underrated album. I&#8217;ll go with the most recent, Funhouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

