My Favourite Jazz Books: A Baker’s Dozen (Tim Powis)

By Tim Powis

Let’s begin with a bit of nonsense: “Historically… writing on jazz has been of such a low standard, has failed so signally to convey any sense of the animating dynamics of the music as to be irrelevant except… insofar as it conveys facts: when a given album was recorded, who played with whom, etc.” So says Geoff Dyer in his long and generally insightful afterword to But Beautiful: A Book About Jazz. Even allowing for the fact that it was first published (in Britain) in 1991, before some of the books listed below came out, and even though But Beautiful itself is among my chosen texts, I don’t know how anyone who’s read as much about jazz as I presume Dyer has could believe that statement. There’s been lots of very good writing about jazz. Much of it, it’s true, dwells to a considerable extent on recording dates and who played with whom, because that kind of information is crucial to sorting out a music in which bands with stable, let alone permanent, line-ups are rare and so many musicians have performed or recorded with so many other musicians. But none of the books I’ve chosen (from critical anthologies to autobiography) fails—signally or otherwise—to convey any sense of jazz’s animating dynamics, and there are plenty more where they came from. Continue reading “My Favourite Jazz Books: A Baker’s Dozen (Tim Powis)”

Music Bookshelf: The Rock Yearbook, 1981/82/83

I own three volumes of The Rock Yearbook—1981 (edited by Michael Gross and Maxim Jakubowski), ’82 and ’83 (both edited by Al Clark)—and they are hugely pleasurable reference books. Published in the UK but with near-equal coverage of US pop (and with contributions from American writers), they combine generally thoughtful overviews (many divided into subgenres; “the year in pop music,” electronic, reggae, soul/disco, jazz, etc.), critical essays on a selection of the year’s biggest names, capsule reviews and/or excerpts of dozens of the year’s releases (in the ’81 edition it’s capsules written to order; in ’82/’83 it’s a vastly more entertaining collage of excerpts from various big name UK/US publications), Continue reading “Music Bookshelf: The Rock Yearbook, 1981/82/83”

On Paul Gorman’s ‘Totally Wired: The Rise and Fall of the Music Press’ (review by Vic Perry)

Totally Wired: The Rise and Fall of the Music Press
Paul Gorman
Thames & Hudson, 2022, 384 pages


A history of the era of transient, perishable published objects that when successful were shortly obsessed over by fans before generally being discarded, this book is a highly covetable object built to last: quality binding and paper, sharp typography, mesmerizing dust cover, gorgeous punk color endpapers, 54 illustrations of magazine covers (many in color). Continue reading “On Paul Gorman’s ‘Totally Wired: The Rise and Fall of the Music Press’ (review by Vic Perry)”

A Consumer Guide to the Plastic People of the Universe

In A Consumer Guide to the Plastic People of the Universe (2021), Joe Yanosik reviews and grades every known PPU record on the planet (including side projects and mutations, not to mention books and DVDs), all the while — through a series of “historical interludes” — telling the band’s remarkable story, from their post-Beatles/Velvets-obsessed roots in Prague to their critical (if somewhat unwitting) role in bringing down a repressive Soviet-backed regime. I mean, the MC5 were cool and all, but… Continue reading “A Consumer Guide to the Plastic People of the Universe”

Rock Critic Laws

In his new book, Rock Critic Law: 101 Unbreakable Rules for Writing Badly About Music, Michael Azerrad takes on the clichés that pervade rock writing. His mode is tongue-in-cheek, with the book written as a sort of satirical ‘Strunk & White’ manual for album reviewers, to be followed at the writer’s peril. If you’ve written about music, you’ll find yourself nodding along in recognition at many of the words and phrases he includes: universally loathed, criminally underrated, twin lead guitars, stunning debut.

Continue reading “Rock Critic Laws”

Major Dudes: A Steely Dan Companion

Major Dudes: A Steely Dan Companion
Edited by Barney Hoskyns
The Overlook Press, 2018.


Reviewed by Vic Perry

“You can always look in the Steely Dan Listener’s Companion,” says Donald Fagen, helpfully answering a question about a lyric in an expansive 1977 interview with Sylvie Simmons originally published in Sounds, a British music paper.  Continue reading “Major Dudes: A Steely Dan Companion”

“Wenners and Losers”

Jessica Hopper reviews Joe Hagan’s Jann Wenner bio in Bookforum:

Sticky Fingers opens with the sort of scene that becomes its defining feature: Jann Wenner sells someone out, transacting on a relationship for whatever gain could be exacted. We meet Wenner as he is poisoning his friendship with no less than John Lennon, betraying Lennon’s trust for a $40,000 book advance. This is grimglorious rock gossip, but who really wants to read about the exploits of a vain, power-mad scoundrel running/ruining a great thing while we are living that very sitch in 2017’s Technicolor real time?”


Under My Thumb

“Discussions and analyses of music—whether on TV, in books or in the music press—have always been full of the stories of men. When female fans appear in these stories it is often through the eyes and from the perspectives of men – as muses, groupies or fangirls—meaning that women’s own experiences, ideas and arguments about the music they love are marginalized or glossed over. Women in music are frequently fetishised and objectified both in song lyrics and in real life, viewed purely in relation to men and through their impact on the male ego. But this hasn’t stopped generations of women from loving, being moved by and critically appreciating music—however that music may feel about them…”

Edited by Rhian E. Jones and Eli Davies, Under My Thumb: Songs That Hate Women and The Women Who Love Them is available now. See some early reader reviews at Goodreads.


Review: Lou Reed bio by Anthony DeCurtis

“While [DeCurtis is] skillful at assembling the biographical building blocks that reward interest at a casual level, his book isn’t just short on dirt. It’s short on resonance, advocacy, identification, deep-dive cultural spelunking, provocative arguments, nuance, fervor, and everything else that sums up the difference between perspective and an actual point of view, particularly when the subject is an artist as gnarly and passion-provoking as Lou Reed.”
Tom Carson reviews Anthony DeCurtis’s Lou Reed: A Life. (With additional compelling thoughts about Bangs, Laurie Anderson, Robert Quine, et al.)